HOME PAGE SITE GUIDE SEARCH REVIEWS REVIEW ARCHIVES ADVERTISING AT CURTAINUP FEATURES NEWS Etcetera and Short Term Listings LISTINGS Broadway Off-Broadway NYC Restaurants BOOKS and CDs OTHER PLACES Berkshires London California New Jersey DC Philadelphia Elsewhere QUOTES TKTS PLAYWRIGHTS' ALBUMS LETTERS TO EDITOR FILM LINKS MISCELLANEOUS Free Updates Masthead |
A CurtainUp Review
Richard III: Born With Teeth
With the tag "Born With Teeth" this villainous Richard III is in modern dress with his charm at full-throttle. Though you might have seen more psychologically-probing takes on Richard, Director Ron Russell surely puts his pedal to the metal and allows you to take a fresh whiff of Richard’s ambition and experience the political world he inhabited. Since a voucher for a signature “York Rose” cocktail comes with your ticket, get to the performance early to claim yours at the lobby bar before show-time. Once you have your drink in hand, you can either settle into your seat or mingle with the “potentates” on stage. No doubt this social-fest is the prelude to the political wheeling-dealing that will unfold. The play starts out with cinematic fluidity, and shuttles between scenes in Shakespeare’s Richard III and Henry VI: Part III. The opener is from Richard III with King Edward IV (Godfrey L. Simmons) telling Rivers (Michael Kirby) and Hastings (Peter Jay Fernandez) to “seek not vengeance, but reconciliation.” You then get a flashback to Henry VI: Part III, where Queen Margaret (Lanna Joffrey) mockingly crowns York with a paper crown before stabbing him to death and ordering his beheading. That beheading order is far and away one of the most dramatic moments in Shakespeare’s canon, and Margaret’s vengeful words still carry their sting: “Off with his head and set it on York gates; So York may overlook the town of York.” This retro-scene not-so-subtly reminds the audience that the York family had suffered a-plenty during the War of the Roses, and that their subsequent power-grab for the crown was, if not completely justified, at least put in the historical context of the blood-thirsty saga. The flashback fades out, and Richard of Gloucester (James Wallert) arrives on the scene, beginning his famous soliloquy: “Now is the winter of our discontent . . . .” With his characteristic candor, lays out his grand design for seizing the crown. You might have heard this speech countless times, but framed by Mikiko Suzuki MacAdams’ alabaster-white set and Melissa Mizell & Cat Tate Starmer’s natural lighting, it gains a fresh immediacy here. The last production of Richard III I saw on stage was at the Brooklyn Academy of Music, with Kevin Spacey stepping into the title role. While that one had stardust going for it, the Epic Theatre Ensembl iteration has more contemporary relevance thanks to the recent exhumation of Richard III. If timing is key, the timing of this show is ideal. But the company is not coasting along on the media’s headlines. Though Russell sometimes overplays the cartoon-like aspect of the play (Written in or around 1592, this is an earlier play of the Bard’s), this is a solid production. It's also so much fun to watch that it would be quibbling to object to its light-handed direction or poetic license. However, some scenes would really have gained more dramatic power with a soberer approach. For instance, the scene where Clarence (Rhett Henckel) is drowned in a Malmsey-butt (purportedly Clarence’s favorite wine) can be emotionally gripping if done with utter sincerity. In this case it was the one time that the actors toppled over into jokey-ness, when they should have simply trusted Shakespeare’s language to work its own mysterious power. All ten actors (Peter Jay Fernandez, Melissa Friedman, Devin E. Haqq, Rhett Henckel, Lanna Joffrey, Michael Kirby, James Joseph O’Neil, Carra Patterson, Godfrey L. Simmons, and James Wallert) strut their stuff, and considering this is Richard III, the strutting doesn’t seem forced but right in step with the politically-astute York family. James Wallert, as Richard of Gloucester, plays his ambitious character with appropriate self-consciousness. Unlike most Richards of yesteryear, Wallert’s Richard doesn’t have a pronounced hunchback or a raised shoulder, though he does hold one hand across his torso like it was frozen in place. It’s only in a late scene, when he strips off his shirt and reveals a steely back brace, that his character’s infamous deformity (many scholars and medical experts suspect that the historical Richard III had some form of scoliosis) is visually glimpsed by the audience. While you may miss the sight of Richard looking like a larger-than-life spider on stage, Wallert subliminally reminds you that the real deformity of his character is in his mind and heart. The performance I attended was followed by a post-show forum, moderated by Julian Zelizer, a Professor of History at Princeton University, and Jessica Blatt, a Professor of Political Science at Marymount Manhattan. Focusing on the topic “How Does New Information Impact Our Perceptions of History,” they discussed the necessity of assessing, and re-assessing, historical figures, over time. Not surprisingly, the late Richard Nixon was held up for discussion. Zelizer pointed out that Nixon, who resigned in the aftermath of the Watergate scandal, may well be seen in a different (and perhaps fairer) light in the future. Both professors agreed that it is easy to demonize historical figures like Richard III and Nixon, and much more difficult to place them in historical perspective.
|
Slings & Arrows- view 1st episode free Anything Goes Cast Recording Our review of the show Book of Mormon -CD Our review of the show |