HOME PAGE SITE GUIDE SEARCH REVIEWS REVIEW ARCHIVES ADVERTISING AT CURTAINUP FEATURES NEWS Etcetera and Short Term Listings LISTINGS Broadway Off-Broadway NYC Restaurants BOOKS and CDs OTHER PLACES Berkshires London California Connecticut New Jersey DC Philadelphia Elsewhere QUOTES TKTS PLAYWRIGHTS' ALBUMS LETTERS TO EDITOR FILM LINKS MISCELLANEOUS Free Updates Masthead Writing for Us |
A CurtainUp Review
Tea at Five
By Elyse Sommer
The Kate who prompted this tea party is Katharine Hepburn, the legendary stage and screen actress whose career spanned more than six decades. Kate Mulgrew, better known to millions as Captain Kathryn Janeway of TV's StarTrek: Voyager is the latest actress parlaying a slight if not identical twin-like resemblance to Hepburn into a showcase for her acting talents. Mulgrew has neither the lean and lanky body or angular face of Hepburn, but she has adapted her own husky voice to capture the distinctive lady-to-the-manor born accent that was Hepburn's hallmark. It is the way she captures the impression of the Hepburn persona and the sense she conveys that she looks as well as sounds like her, that gives her performance its tour-de-force stamp and will make audiences (especially Hepburn and/or StarTrek fans) overlook the weakness of Matthew Lombardo's script. John Tillinger's lively direction and Tony Straiges' handsome recreation of the Connecticut estate where the ninety-six-year-old Hepburn still lives, help to make for an entertaining hour and forty minutes despite Lombardo's failure to make Tea with this Kate as stimulating and enlightning as it deserves to be. The play's structure of two tea time conversations between Hepburn and the audience, as well as assorted people who keep the phone frequently off the hook, is fine. The 1938 act one to the 1983 act two makes for a startling transition from thirty-one-year old anxious to get her chops into a career-reviving role (Scarlett O'Hara) to a seventy-six-year old recovering from an accident probably caused by the palsy about which she is still in denial. The solo play's technique of using the audience to supply the sense of interaction that's missing when only one actor is on stage make a decorating scheme that has the couch facing the orchestra rather than the fireplace perfectly acceptable -- or would be if Ms. Mulgrew wasn't asked to stride on stage as if in a regular scene and then make an instant ninety-degree turn to become our wisecracking confidante. The second and better act, is much more subtle in taking us from the older Hepburn to her fourteen year old self touchingly reliving the suicide of her beloved older brother. The above quibble would be minor if the piece generally, and the first act in particular, weren't so much an example of lazy playwriting. Granted, that the prime audience for this are Hepburn enthusiasts who have seen enough of her films and plays, and read her own still in-print biography, Me: Stories of My Life as well as other accounts of her much publicized, twenty-seven year relationship with her co-star in Adam's Rib, Spencer Tracy. But even if these viewers are up on who's who in Hepburn's Hollywood, why not give younger audience members a break and identify Leland as Leland Hayward; Howard as millionaire Howard Hughess, who sent her the script for Philadelphia Story, a far more successful vehicle for her than Gone With the Wind would have been); and Warren as Warren Beattie (the caller trying to lure her out of retirement) as Warren Beattie? Better still, why not, instead of all this tabloid style name-dropping, give us a fuller picture of Hepburn's impulse to become an actress and the people and experiences encountered on her way up and down the Hollywood ladder. It would have helped to include some biographical details in the program notes as well as a list of her plays and films -- the latter included for readers' enlightenment at the end of the program notes. According to a friend who saw the Hartford production of Tea at Five, the original second act included a brief montage of film clips. I can see where this might have been intrusive as part of the play. Despite Mr. Lombardi's poor choices of what to include and omit, there is considerable charm in his Hepburn character talking with a self-deprecating sense of humor about the slings and arrows tossed her way. If Dorothy Parker were still around she might well apply rate Hepburn's interpreter as lifting a script with a depth ranging from A to B to an A to Z range performance.
|
At This Theater Leonard Maltin's 2003 Movie and Video Guide Ridiculous!The Theatrical Life & Times of Charles Ludlam Somewhere For Me, a Biography of Richard Rodgers The New York Times Book of Broadway: On the Aisle for the Unforgettable Plays of the Last Century 6, 500 Comparative Phrases including 800 Shakespearean Metaphors by CurtainUp's editor. Click image to buy. Go here for details and larger image. |