HOME PAGE SITE GUIDE SEARCH REVIEWS FEATURES NEWS Etcetera and Short Term Listings LISTINGS Broadway Off-Broadway NYC Restaurants BOOKS and CDs OTHER PLACES Berkshires London California New Jersey DC Philadelphia Elsewhere QUOTES TKTS PLAYWRIGHTS' ALBUMS LETTERS TO EDITOR FILM LINKS MISCELLANEOUS Free Updates Masthead Writing for Us |
A CurtainUp London Review
The Last Confession
Interestingly this is 61 year old New Yorker Roger Crane's first play and from a man who up to now has been a lawyer. The play has many parts for men, almost all of them of mature years. It is based on the early death of Pope John Paul I (Richard O'Callaghan) who died of a presumed heart attack just 33 days after his election in 1978. Now as one of his first actions was to question the Church's policy on key issues, such as the use of contraception and test tube intervention to create life, he would undoubtedly have been more liberal as a Pope than his predecessor Pope Paul VI (Clifford Rose) or his successor Pope John Paul II. When we add the terrible way in which the Vatican Bank was being run and the later mysterious "suicide" of financier Roberto Calvi, who was found hanging under a bridge in London, it starts to look as if vested interests might have preferred the reforming Pope not to have been elected. The play takes the form of flashback starting with Cardinal Benelli's (David Suchet) confession to the mysterious confessor (Michael Jayston). Giovanni Benelli is the man who has promoted John Paul I into the papacy. As Cardinal Jean Villot (Bernard Lloyd) tells Benelli in the second act, "He wasn't a Pope. He was a country priest you pushed into the Curia." Suchet instead of playing Christie's Hercule Poirot, here is a detective Cardinal, a power broker who wants to find out what has happened to his unfortunate protegée. But he trades in demands for a full inquest in return for a crack at the papacy himself. We get a picture of the political machinations within the Curia as reactionary Cardinals stifle reform and modernity using the excuse that that is the way it has always been done and that any other path would destabilise the Church. Suchet is of course magnificent, with an able and experienced supporting cast. He conveys a man who has doubts and who genuinely wants to do the correct thing although that might mean being accused of furthering his own ambition. We are never in doubt that while the others want the power for their own ends, Benelli wants to be Pope to do the best he can. He believes in his ideals although he questions his faith in God. I liked too the simplicity and humility of Richard O'Callaghan's John Paul I making him seem like a lamb when set against the fox of Charles Kay's Cardinal Pericle Felici or the bull of the American Bishop Paul Mancinkus (Stuart Milligan). William Dudley's set is magnificently marbled with walls to the exterior of grilles where the Vatican Guard are stationed to keep out the people or is it to keep the Pope in? When the Pope attempts to go for a walk on his own, we are told it is more usual for him to be carrried in a litter by eight men. Add the Cardinals in their scarlet robes and it is as if we are watching some splendid spectacle. The writing is lucid and the motivations clear although the formula is an old fashioned "whodunnit". My only problem is with the juxtaposition of real people with unproved events so that history merges with fiction. It would be most interesting to interview Roger Crane about his research for The Last Confession.
|
|