HOME PAGE SEARCH CurtainUp REVIEWS FEATURES NEWS Etcetera and Short Term Listings LISTINGS Broadway Off-Broadway BOOKS and CDs OTHER PLACES Berkshires London LA/San Diego DC Philadelphia Elsewhere QUOTES On TKTS LETTERS TO EDITOR FILM LINKS MISCELLANEOUS Free Updates Masthead Writing for CurtainUp |
A CurtainUp Review Fit to Kill
The problem is that while there's some suspense about the how and when of the murder that's obviously going to happen, all three characters are immoral enough to make us accept them as either killer or victim. None are interesting enough to hold our attention. The two main characters are Adrian Bonham (Patrick Melville), a professional chess player in his thirties, who, to support his taste for the finer things in life, has allowed himself to become the boy toy husband of Janice Stoner (Jana Robbins), a controlling mid-forties exercise empire tycoon. The outsider bringing trouble to the already troubled relationship is Amy Courtland (Lanie MacEwan), a disgruntled employee of Janet's. Adrian represents every stereotype of the man who relies on his charm to support his expensive habits. Janice is equally stereotypical, the very model of the worst case profile for the hard-driving, castrating career woman. And Amy. . .well, she's just plain unbelievable. The chess background adds little to the intrigue except a rather gimmicky checkered floor -- which doesn't go with Robert R. Sweetman's elegant furnishings for the home in which the motivations and plans for the murder unfold. Maybe if the playwright and director had made more use of chess grandmaster Susan Polgar, who's listed in the program as a consultant, more could have been made of this than an opening sequence in which Adrian, facing the audience, replays a chess game in which he makes the wrong move (foreshadowing all the wrong moves to come, by him and the two women). I'm not giving much away if I tell you that Adrian is fed up enough with Janice to do her in and that Janice isn't all that anxious to hold onto him either. That's because this is strictly an amateur chess game, with every clue is blatantly obvious, rather than played with finesse. Neither the actors or director Eric Parness manage to overcome the intrinsic flatness of this flat-footed thriller. The play's only redeeming feature is that it costs just $15 -- but then if you surf around the channels on your home screen, you might just find some free reruns of those half-hour thrillers Rod Serling did so well.
|
Easy-on-the budget super gift for yourself and your musical loving friends. Tons of gorgeous pictures. Retold by Tina Packer of Shakespeare & Co. Click image to buy. Our Review At This Theater Leonard Maltin's 2005 Movie Guide Ridiculous!The Theatrical Life & Times of Charles Ludlam 6, 500 Comparative Phrases including 800 Shakespearean Metaphors by CurtainUp's editor. Click image to buy. Go here for details and larger image. |